Web Exclusives

Mexican Congress shut down to stop privatization

Wednesday, 23 April 2008 | by: Cynthia Mckinney


Full Story >>

Urgent appeal to honor Casper Banjo

Monday, 24 March 2008 | by TheArthur Wright


Full Story >>

Mud cookie economics in Haiti

Friday, 21 March 2008 | by Kevin Pina


Full Story >>

JSN ImageShow - Joomla 1.5 extension (component, module) by JoomlaShine.com

Home arrow About Us arrow Haiti arrow When the people stand up, the people can win
When the people stand up, the people can win PDF Print E-mail
by: Cynthia McKinney   
Wednesday, 23 April 2008

Image
Cynthia McKinney fired up the crowd at the Free Mumia rally Saturday in Philly.
In Mexico City at the Second Continental Workers’ Conference (Segundo Encuentro Continental de los Trabajadores), eight countries were represented and a united front now exists in Mexico against the NAFTA-inspired privatizations that could have resulted in the theft of Mexico’s patrimony in natural resources. The Mexican Congress, due to adjourn on April 30, is all but shut down by the real opposition that they have in Mexico.

Bush even looked impotent as he stood in New Orleans with Cardenas (el spurio), Mexico’s “president” who didn’t deliver. The PEMEX privatization bill was supposed to have passed by now. Mexico’s Congress will adjourn without passing it. Score one for the people.

When the people stand up, the people can win. But when we fail or fear to stand up, we are assured of losing.

Image
On Nov. 27, 2005, Cite Soleil came under heavy fire once again from Brazilian forces in a military operation against suspected “bandits,” a code word for supporters of Lavalas, President Aristide’s party, in poor neighborhoods. Amnesty International has accused Brazilian forces of human rights violations back home in the poor neighborhoods of Sao Paolo known as favelas.
In Mexico City, my dear friend, David Josue, stood up and, in so doing, won a victory for those of us who identify with the struggle of the Haitian people. David simply wrote and read a letter to Lula, who has agreed to occupy Haiti for what some speculate might be a chance to get a seat on the Security Council of the United Nations.

David’s letter was so moving that the Brazilian delegation and the entire Encuentro (Conference) had to respond. The letter was moving because it was true. And everyone in that room, so full of suffering as they were, knew that no suffering at the Encuentro was any greater than that of the Haitian people – to whom many in the Americas owe their cloak of freedom.

The letter was read at the Encuentro. And then the letter was read directly to Lula by one of the Brazilian Parliament members who is a member of Lula’s party. And now, Lula is planning a visit to Haiti.

Sadly, according to Lula’s statement in the press, his visit has nothing to do with the murders and atrocities the Brazilians have committed while occupying Haiti, but instead he is going there because of “Haitian poverty.” We have all seen the images of the Haitians desperate for food, but Lula was one of the first leaders to endorse ethanol – which displaces land used to grow food with land exploited for guzzling energy.

Even Fidel Castro castigated Lula publicly for that decision. Here’s what Castro said: “You now have the two things: safe supplies of fuel, raw food materials and manufactured food products. The end of cheap food has already been announced. I ask him, ‘What do you think the dozens of countries with many hundreds of millions of inhabitants will do who have neither the one nor the other?’ ... Meanwhile, we [Cubans] have been creating and we should keep on creating reserves of food and fuel.” And finally, Castro describes as macabre the “idea of turning foodstuffs into fuel for leisure and luxury.”

Last month, Breitbart reported that Bill Clinton and other “high-profile financial players” are at the center of a brewing scandal in Brazil over the “‘degrading’ living conditions for 133 sugarcane workers employed by an ethanol company whose investors include former President Clinton.”

I hope Lula’s visit to Haiti will also focus on the conduct of his troops who are responsible for more death and mayhem than is described in David’s letter. I’d like to hear Lula forthrightly say something about the deaths caused by his soldiers and his decision to occupy Haiti as he intones his concern for Haiti’s poverty. I hope he’s concerned about both.

Brazil, under Lula’s leadership, is supposed to be Haiti’s friend; Lula can personally keep it that way – or he can let the killings continue. The choice is his.

At any rate, here’s the letter in English and then the parliamentary debate in Portuguese [not included here]. The Encuentro passed a resolution to directly address the occupation of Haiti and the treatment of Haitians by the Brazilian-led U.N. forces.

David Josue’s letter to the Segundo Encuentro in Mexico City April 5, 2008

I want to thank the organizers of this important Segundo Encuentro for providing me an opportunity to address this body and to put the issue of Brazilian conduct in Haiti on the table for discussion.

My comments are directed at President de Silva and I ask the delegates here from Brazil to please relay my concerns to the government in Brasilia.

President Lula da Silva:

Something untoward is going on with your soldiers in Haiti. Brazilian soldiers are conducting terrifying raids on residents of poor and defenseless communities throughout Haiti, leaving in their wake a trail of blood, tears and death.

The buck stops with you, President da Silva. You are their commander in chief.
What your soldiers are doing to the innocent people of Haiti is worse than what the armed forces of Haiti were accused of doing.

No one will attempt to mitigate the utmost importance of living in a state of law. No one objects to getting a proper warrant before the proper court seeks an arrest of the accused and brings him or her to justice. But a collective warrant that declares an entire community criminal is, in itself, criminal.

President Lula da Silva, what would you say to Fredi Romelus for his terrible loss? His 1-year-old son, Nelson Romelus – what was his crime? Why was he executed by your soldiers? His 4-year-old brother Stanley, who died of a high-powered gunshot wound to the head – what was his crime? Their mother, Sonia Romelus, who died while clutching her baby, Nelson – what was her crime?

Lelene Mertina, 24 years old, was six months pregnant when a bullet ripped through her abdomen, instantly killing her unborn fetus. What was she guilty of to deserve this?

President da Silva, according to a U.N. after-action report, your soldiers spent seven hours shooting at an unarmed population. They expended over 22,000 rounds of ammunition, knowing they were striking unintended targets. This cannot possibly be the best that the Brazilian people have to offer. How can this happen when you are the president of Brazil?

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. reminded us that there comes a time when silence is betrayal. Will you and your administration remain silent on these atrocities?

Sign up for updates from Cynthia McKinney, candidate for the Green Party presidential nomination, at http://lists.allthingscynthiamckinney.com/listinfo.cgi/updates-allthingscynthiamckinney.com.

Tag it:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Digg
YahooMyWeb
 
< Prev   Next >

Sign Me Up
for Bay View updates & alerts




JSN ImageShow - Joomla 1.5 extension (component, module) by JoomlaShine.com


Valid XHTML & CSS - Design by ah-68 - Copyright © 2007 by Firma